In the world of nonsurgical body sculpting, two distinct methods stand out – Fat Dissolving Injections and CoolSculpting. Designed to eliminate stubborn pockets of fat without surgery, they each offer a unique approach to overcoming the bulge. But which one is truly superior? Read on as we compare the two treatments and offer our verdict on weight loss injections vs. CoolSculpting.
Weight Loss Injections vs. CoolSculpting – How Do They Compare?
1. Mechanism of Action
Fat Dissolving Injections: Kybella is one of the best known fat dissolving injections. It uses a synthetic deoxycholic acid, a molecule that naturally occurs in the body, to break down dietary fat.
When injected into the fatty tissue, it destroys fat cells, resulting in a noticeable reduction in fullness.
CoolSculpting: On the other hand, CoolSculpting employs a process called cryolipolysis, which freezes fat cells without damaging surrounding skin or tissue. The targeted cells undergo apoptosis (cell death) and are naturally and gradually excreted from the body.
2. Effectiveness
Various studies have shown a single CoolSculpting session can reduce fat by as much as 25% in the treated area.
In comparison, fat dissolving injections progressively decrease the number of fat cells in the treated area. However, they typically require multiple sessions for best results.
3. Patient Comfort
While the idea of injections or cold exposure may sound uncomfortable, patient experience tells a different story.
CoolSculpting, being a non-invasive procedure, is generally well-tolerated. In fact, most patients work, read, or watch a movie during their sessions.
On the other hand, fat dissolving injections can be more painful. To this end, they often require the administration of a local anesthetic or application of ice packs after the procedure.
4. Side Effects and Downtime
When it comes to comparing weight loss injections vs. CoolSculpting, possible side effects are a significant area of concern.
CoolSculpting boasts an excellent safety profile and is associated with mild and temporary side effects. They may include redness, swelling, and tenderness in the treated area, which subside within 24 hours.
Fat dissolving injections often cause bruising, swelling, and numbness that may last several days to several weeks. Serious side effects are rare when the treatment is administered by a trained professional.
5. Number of Treatments Needed
CoolSculpting often requires just one treatment to see significant slimming and sculpting in the targeted area. This is especially useful for busy individuals who may find the notion of multiple doctor visits less than appealing, despite the shorter duration of each session.
Alternatively, fat dissolving injections necessitate multiple treatments, typically spaced a month or more apart, which can prolong the process for several months.
6. Longevity of Results
Longevity of results is crucial when comparing weight loss injections vs. CoolSculpting.
With proper diet and exercise, the results of CoolSculpting are considered permanent. That’s because the treatment actually destroys fat cells, meaning they are gone for good.
Fat dissolving injections can also offer long-term benefits if weight is maintained. However, subsequent weight gain can alter results over time.
The Takeaway
In conclusion, the ultimate decision between weight loss injections vs. CoolSculpting depends on personal preferences, tolerance to the respective procedures, and desired level of invasiveness in the pursuit of a sculpted physique.
That said, when it comes to innovation and patient preference, CoolSculpting holds the edge. This is due to its proven effectiveness, single-treatment convenience, less invasive nature, and zero downtime.
Schedule a CoolSculpting Consultation
Ready to take the next step? If so, please call our office today to schedule a CoolSculpting consultation with one of our top-notch specialists!
